In Swift, you can almost do the same, though the syntax makes it look less like native syntax.
I just wrote this in a Swift playground in Xcode 8.1.
NOTE: just because this is possible, doesn't mean you should do this. Readability and testability matters. This is just exploring the language.
import Foundation
extension Int {
func through(_ end: Int, `do`: (_ i: Int)->() ) {
var i = self
while i <= end {
`do`(i)
i += 1
}
}
// originally, I thought of naming this 'to' but that's ambiguous
// whether the loop executes using the end value or not.
}
print("through loop 12-15")
12.through(15, do: {i in print("\(i)")})
/* prints
through loop 12-15
12
13
14
15
*/
print("through loop 1-5")
1.through(5) { index in print("\(index)") }
/* prints:
through loop 1-5
1
2
3
4
5
*/
extension Int {
func upTo(_ end: Int, `do`: (_ i: Int)->() ) {
var i = self
while i < end {
`do`(i)
i += 1
}
}
}
print("upTo 12-15")
12.upTo(15, do: {i in print("\(i)")})
/* prints
upTo 12-15
12
13
14
*/
print("upTo 0-5")
0.upTo(5) { index in print("\(index)") }
/* prints
upTo 0-5
0
1
2
3
4
*/
/*
It's much more readable if you use the built-in syntax:
*/
print("for 12 through 15")
for i in 12...15 {
print("\(i)")
}
/* prints
for 12 through 15
12
13
14
15
*/
print("for 0 up to 5")
for i in 0..<5 { print("\(i)") }
/* prints
for 0 up to 5
0
1
2
3
4
*/
No comments:
Post a Comment